TRIDENT Postshot Report: Flyer Impact Experiments on NiTi and NiAl, December 2001 - "Pink Flamingo"

Reference:P-24-U:2003-035; LA-UR-03-3101
From:Damian Swift, P-24
To:Distribution
Date:January 14, 2002

A pink flamingo in the wild.

Contents

Introduction

This note summarizes the series of TRIDENT materials experiments performed from 17 to 20 December 2001. This work was in support of the FY'00/02 LDRD-ER on martensitic phase changes (PIs: Dan Thoma and Allan Hauer) and the FY'02/04 LDRD-DR on shocks in anisotropic media (PI: Aaron Koskelo).

An abbreviated version was submitted as an LA-UR for classification in early 2002 but disappeared into the ether. This memo is a replacement.

Objectives

The overall objectives of this experimental series were to measure some equation of state (EOS) and strength data for martensitic NiTi alloys and NiAl alloys, to complement ab initio calculations and more complicated experiments.

The specific objectives of these experiments were:

Calendar

Table 1 shows the dates of the experiments. As hoped, this work was able to follow a series of flyer development tests, so most of the equipment was already set up. The flyer trials finished a few days later than expected (and required an extra half-day at the end of these experiments), and we were not allowed to continue firing into January, so the total amount of time available was significantly less than we had hoped for (Table 2).

EventPlanActual
Start of TRIDENT time~10 Dec17 Dec
First shot~11 Dec17 Dec
Last shot~20 Dec20 Dec

Table 1. Calendar of events.

PlanActualComments
Duration2 weeks0.75 weeks
Laser available8 days3.5 days
Shots (time after set-up)8 days3 days

Table 2. Period, availability and usage.

Targets

There were insufficient BK7 substrates left over after the preceding flyer development series to be useful in this series, so PMMA substrates were used instead. The flyer speeds were therefore less than could be achieved with BK7, for the same laser energy.

Copper foils were purchased from Goodfellow Corp; most flyers were punched from this stock. The foils had distinct striations and machining marks. We attempted to remove these from the surface to avoid the generation of interference patterns which might interfere with the laser velocimetry measurements, by polishing the surface manually using diamond paste. This was only partially successful.

NiTi samples of two compositions were provided by R. Hackenberg (MST-7). These included flyers, ~100 to 200 µm thick and 5 mm in diameter, and semicircular targets, ~100 to 400 µm thick. The previous NiTi samples had a near-mirror finish, and the velocimetry signal was not obscured by window reflections. This time, we had agreed to try less polished samples to see whether less time could be spent preparing the samples. Adequate signals were obtained from bare samples, but the reflection from (uncoated) PMMA windows was slightly stronger than from the samples.

Samples of NiAl crystal cut along (100) planes were provided by K. McClellan (MST-8). These were irregularly-shaped targets, ~100 to 400 µm thick.

The flyer was attached to the substrate with five-minute epoxy, the flyer being pressed down to minimize the thickness of the glue layer. Spacer rings, punched from plastic shim stock, were inserted between the substrate and the target assembly (i.e. the window) to allow space for the flyer to accelerate. The distance from the free surface of the flyer to the impact surface of the sample is referred to as the barrel length. The complete assembly was screwed together in a target holder. Some shots in the series were dedicated to measuring the acceleration history of the flyer and hence the barrel length required to reach the maximum speed. We had anticipated that, between the uncertainty in laser energy delivered and the uncertainty in the barrel length, there might be a significant uncertainty in the impact time, particularly for the thicker flyers driven with lower energies. In the limited time available, we did not measure the thickness of the glue bond; this was potentially a cause for concern. In practice, the energy delivered was very close to the value requested, and the barrel length was also reproducible (indicating that the glue bond in the flyer was thin and reproducible), so the impact time could be predicted with reasonable accuracy.

All final assembly was performed in-house at TRIDENT.

Diagnostics

As planned, we used the Johnson line VISAR and a point VISAR. The input/output optics developed previously [1] were re-used.

We had planned to image the target into the line VISAR and then to the streak camera. In the event, Randy Johnson developed his previous technique of imaging the target straight through the VISAR (i.e. focused at infinity) to the camera to make better use of the full width of the camera. He also incorporated timing markers on the streak record. As before, the probe laser was made to produce a long (~1.5 µs) pulse to be able to capture the acceleration and impact of the flyer.

Since the P-24 point VISAR was not complete, we used the Sandia VISAR borrowed for the preceding experiments. The P-24 Verde laser was used.

We had intended to assemble the experiments so that the PMMA window was split, with half coplanar with the impact surface of the sample. This would provide a time fiducial for the arrival of the flyer. The PMMA semicircles did not arrive until after the start of the experimental session, so early experiments were performed with a full disc of PMMA. The VISAR recording window was usually not long enough to capture the impact of the flyer directly with the window, so this time fiducial -- and thus the direct measurement of shock speed - was not available in these experiments.

We investigated the use of an alternative technique, attaching the sample to a copper disc ~50 µm thick, as in flyer plate experiments at Z [2]. The shock breakout in the copper provided the time fiducial. This technique was not suitable for `symmetric impact' experiments where the flyer and sample were the same material.

We intended to perform all experiments so that the target was in contact with a PMMA window, providing a well-characterised loading history and facilitating sample recovery. Because of the relatively low reflectivity of the NiTi samples, and to make assembly simpler with a fiducial for shock arrival, some shots were fired with a bare sample. In these cases, the sample was lost.

Drive beam

TRIDENT was operated in long-pulse mode, driving with the A beam. This configuration was the same as the preceding flyer development shots. The IR random-phase plate (RPP) was added to smooth the beam; this made a significant difference to the spatial uniformity. The drive energy was quite low, so no RPP shield was included. The RPP collected a small amount of debris from the substrate, but was not significantly damaged. The surface of the RPP became misty after a couple of shots; this did not degrade the energy imparted to the flyer to any appreciable extent, and no larger-scale damage was observed after repeated firings through the same region of the RPP (as was feared if the misty layer absorbed much of the laser energy). We moved the RPP to expose a fresh region once during this series of experiments. The cause of the misting was not determined; one possibility was thought to be the oxidation of a layer of grease collected during storage. However, a surface previously cleaned with ethanol also became misty.

Shots

Table 3 summarizes the number of experiments fired of each type. We assumed a firing rate of 8 shots per day in our original plans; this had previously been found to be practical for sustained firing. In the event, we managed a rate of ~11 shots per day, even with distractions during the period of the experiments.

TopicShotsComments
PlanActual
Diagnostic timing52
Flyer acceleration129
Impact timing20
NiTi1514Plan: per composition.
NiAl128Plan: per orientation.
Total4633Plan: excludes some data shots.
Shots per day811

Table 3. Shot statistics.

Only two shots were required to time in the diagnostics, thanks to the work performed during Dennis Paisley's flyer development experiments immediately beforehand. Usable data were obtained from both VISARs in every other experiment, except for one NiTi shot in which the line VISAR record was obscured by window reflection. (There was considerable interference in other NiTi experiments, but the record was still usable.) Excellent flyer acceleration records were obtained for copper flyers of different thickness and using different energies. We decided to omit corresponding acceleration shots for NiTi flyers, and used an areal mass scaling instead. To save more time, we omitted copper/copper impacts to verify the barrel length, and proceeded directly with NiTi.

The target numbering for NiAl and NiTi samples is shown in Tables 4 to 6, and the complete list of shots in Table 7.

No.FlyerBarrelTargetWindows
1Cu, 105300NiAl GE (001), 200PMMA disc
2Cu, 105300NiAl GE (001), 217PMMA disc
3Cu, 105200NiAl GE (001), 217PMMA disc
4Cu, 250150Cu, 55 um / NiAl GE (001), 398
5Cu, 250150Cu, 55 um / NiAl GE (001), 398
6Cu, 250150Cu, 55 um / NiAl GE (001), 398
7Cu, 250150NiAl GE (001), 398PMMA step-disc
8Cu, 250150NiAl GE (001), 398PMMA step-disc

Table 4. NiAl samples.

CodeComposition
5B52.5 at % Ni
6B55.6 at % Ni

Table 5. NiTi compositions.

No.FlyerBarrelTargetWindows
1NiTi 5B, 90/80-85 edge300NiTi 5B, 191/181 edgePMMA disc
2NiTi 5B, 102/92-100 edge300NiTi 5B, 197/188 edgePMMA disc
3NiTi 5B, 108/101-106 edge200NiTi 5B, 202/192 edgePMMA disc
4NiTi 5B, 201/195 edge150NiTi 5B, 403/388 edgePMMA step-disc
5NiTi 5B, 207/204 edge150NiTi 5B, 404/399 edgePMMA step-disc
6NiTi 5B, 209/202 edge150NiTi 5B, 419/404 edgePMMA step-disc
7NiTi 5B, 154/148 edge375NiTi 5B, 300/290 edgePMMA half-disc over flyer
8NiTi 5B, 156/148 edge375NiTi 5B, 305/295 edgePMMA half-disc over flyer
9Cu, 55200NiTi 5B, 88/85 edgePMMA half-disc over flyer
10Cu, 55500NiTi 5B, 91/89 edgePMMA half-disc over flyer
11Cu, 55500NiTi 5B, 95/85 edgePMMA half-disc over flyer
12Cu, 55575NiTi 6B, 113/107 edgePMMA half-disc over flyer
13NiTi 6B, 90/86 edge200NiTi 6B, 211/208 edgePMMA half-disc over flyer
14NiTi 6B, 222/216 edge80NiTi 6B, 414/410 edgePMMA half-disc over flyer

Table 6. NiTi samples.

ShotFlyerBarrelTargetEnergy Line VISARPoint VISARComments
(um) (J) sweepdelaysweepdelay
(ns)(ns)(ns)(ns)
17 Dec
14117Cu, 105 µm1600PMMA10 200080030003300point late, line ?early, recovery OK
14118Cu, 105 µm1600PMMA9 200010030002200Little motion. RPP shield discoloured => ?drive too low.
14119Cu, 105 µm1600PMMA10 200010030002200Beautiful acceleration to ~280 m/s. Noticed misty sheen to beam area of RPP.
14120Cu, 105 µm1600PMMA5 200010030002200Beautiful acceleration to ~160 m/s. Misty sheen no worse.
14121Cu, 105 µm1600PMMA20 200010030002200Beautiful acceleration to ~350 m/s. Flyer escaped through PMMA window. Misty sheen no worse.
18 Dec
14123NiTi, 90 µm300NiTi, 191 µm / PMMA10 200010030002200NiTi #1
14124NiTi, 102 µm300NiTi, 197 µm / PMMA20 200010030002200NiTi #2
14125NiTi, 108 µm200NiTi, 202 µm / PMMA5 200010030002200NiTi #3
14126Cu, 105 µm300NiAl 001, 200 µm / PMMA11 200010030002200NiAl #1
14127Cu, 105 µm300NiAl 001, 217 µm / PMMA20 200010030002200NiAl #2
14128Cu, 105 µm200NiAl 001, 217 µm / PMMA4 200010030002200NiAl #3
14129Cu, 55 µm1600PMMA11 200010030002200Accelerated to ~470 m/s
14130Cu, 55 µm1600PMMA19 200010030002200Accelerated to ~630 m/s
14131Cu, 55 µm1600PMMA5 200010030002200Accelerated to ~310 m/s
14132Cu, 250 µm1600PMMA11 200010030002200Accelerated to ~130 m/s
19 Dec
14134Cu, 250 µm1600PMMA24 200010030002200Accelerated to ~220 m/s
14135Cu, 250 µm1600PMMA5 200010030002200Accelerated to ~80 m/s
14136Cu, 250 µm150Cu, 55 µm / NiAl 001, 398 µm11 2000160030003700NiAl #4 (Cu baseplate)
14137Cu, 250 µm150Cu, 55 µm / NiAl 001, 398 µm19 2000160030003700NiAl #5 (Cu baseplate)
14138Cu, 250 µm150Cu, 55 µm / NiAl 001, 398 µm15 2000160030003700NiAl #6 (Cu baseplate)
14139Cu, 250 µm150NiAl 001, 398 µm / PMMA11 2000110030002200NiAl #7 (PMMA step-disc)
14140Cu, 250 µm150NiAl 001, 398 µm / PMMA20 2000110030002700NiAl #8 (PMMA step-disc)
14141NiTi, 201 µm150NiTi, 403 µm / PMMA11 2000110030002700NiTi #4 (PMMA step-disc)
14142NiTi, 207 µm150NiTi, 404 µm / PMMA19 200070030002700NiTi #5 (PMMA step-disc)
14143NiTi, 209 µm150NiTi, 409 µm / PMMA16 2000110030002700NiTi #6 (PMMA step-disc)
14144NiTi, 154 µm375NiTi, 300 µm10 2000160030002700NiTi #7 (PMMA impact fiducial)
20 Dec
14146NiTi, 156 µm375NiTi, 305 µm22 2000160030002700NiTi #8 (PMMA impact fiducial)
14147Cu, 55 µm200NiTi, 88 µm12 200060030002700NiTi #9 (PMMA impact fiducial)
14148Cu, 55 µm500NiTi, 91 µm21 2000110030002700NiTi #10 (PMMA impact fiducial) Fringes not clear.
14149Cu, 55 µm500NiTi, 95 µm17 200060030002700NiTi #11 (PMMA impact fiducial)
14150Cu, 55 µm580NiTi, 113 µm20 200060030002700NiTi (new comp) #12 (PMMA impact fiducial)
14151NiTi, 90 µm200NiTi, 211 µm10 200060030002700NiTi #13 (PMMA impact fiducial)
14152NiTi, 222 µm100NiTi, 414 µm11 200060030002700NiTi #14 (PMMA impact fiducial)

Table 7. Summary of all shots. In all cases, the spot diameter was ~4 mm and the drive laser produced radiation of 1.054 µm (IR), VISAR velocimetry was used, and the drive pulse was ~600 ns long. Unless stated, all flyers were launched from a PMMA/C/Al/Al2O3/Al substrate, glued with epoxy.

Results

We obtained clean flyer acceleration data on copper flyers between ~50 and 200 µm thick, driven from a coated PMMA substrate with ~5 to 20 J of laser energy. We also obtained some corresponding acceleration data from NiTi flyers.

We collected NiTi data including histories for interface speed and free surface speed as a function of impactor speed. The data included some measurements of shock speed, but the uncertainty in this quantity may be quite large,

The NiAl data were similar, though fewer shots were fired; the sample finish was smoother, so the fringe contrast in the line VISAR was very high.

It should be possible to extract EOS and strength data on NiTi and NiAl from these experiments. The recovered samples are also available for metallographic analysis, if desired.

Conclusions

Useful data were obtained on the dynamic response of NiTi and NiAl, and on flyer acceleration. Fewer experiments were fired than expected; this was caused by limits on the TRIDENT time available. The firing rate was higher than expected during the time the laser was available.

Detailed analysis of the VISAR data is in progress.

We would like to have further TRIDENT time to complete the planned measurements on both materials, as well as to perform follow-up work.

Acknowledgements

Bob Hackenberg (MST-6) and Ken McClellan (MST-8) spent a lot of time preparing samples. We would like to thank the TRIDENT staff including Randy Johnson, Tom Hurry, Tom Ortiz, Fred Archuleta, Nathan Okamoto, and Ray Gonzales for their hard work on the experiments. Dennis Paisley provided experimental advice and help with the analysis and interpretation of VISAR records.

This work was performed in part under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract # W-7405-ENG-36.

References

  1. D.L. Paisley, D.C. Swift, R.P. Johnson, J.C. Lashley and J.G. Niemczura, Flyer plates launched with long laser pulses, LA-UR-01-5814 (2001).
  2. D.C. Swift, Uniaxial shocks in beryllium: preshot calculations for experiments at Z, LA-UR-01-341 (2001).

Distribution

Allan HauerICF&RP Program Managerhauer@lanl.gov
Steve BathaICF&RP Experiments Managersbatha@lanl.gov
Dan ThomaLDRD-ER PIthoma@lanl.gov
Aaron KoskeloLDRD-DR PIkoskelo@lanl.gov
Cris BarnesP-24 Group Officecbarnes@lanl.gov
Carter MunsonP-24 Group Officecmunson@lanl.gov
Robert GibsonTRIDENT team leaderrbg@lanl.gov
Randy JohnsonTRIDENTrpjohnson@lanl.gov
George KyralaP-24 Target Physics Team Leaderkyrala@lanl.gov
Dennis PaisleyP-24 Materials Teampaisley@lanl.gov
Robert HackenbergMST-6roberth@lanl.gov
Ken McClellanMST-8kmcclellan@lanl.gov