Reference: | P-24-U:2003-035; LA-UR-03-3101 |
---|---|
From: | Damian Swift, P-24 |
To: | Distribution |
Date: | January 14, 2002 |
An abbreviated version was submitted as an LA-UR for classification in early 2002 but disappeared into the ether. This memo is a replacement.
The specific objectives of these experiments were:
Event | Plan | Actual |
Start of TRIDENT time | ~10 Dec | 17 Dec |
First shot | ~11 Dec | 17 Dec |
Last shot | ~20 Dec | 20 Dec |
Plan | Actual | Comments | |
Duration | 2 weeks | 0.75 weeks | |
Laser available | 8 days | 3.5 days | |
Shots (time after set-up) | 8 days | 3 days |
Copper foils were purchased from Goodfellow Corp; most flyers were punched from this stock. The foils had distinct striations and machining marks. We attempted to remove these from the surface to avoid the generation of interference patterns which might interfere with the laser velocimetry measurements, by polishing the surface manually using diamond paste. This was only partially successful.
NiTi samples of two compositions were provided by R. Hackenberg (MST-7). These included flyers, ~100 to 200 µm thick and 5 mm in diameter, and semicircular targets, ~100 to 400 µm thick. The previous NiTi samples had a near-mirror finish, and the velocimetry signal was not obscured by window reflections. This time, we had agreed to try less polished samples to see whether less time could be spent preparing the samples. Adequate signals were obtained from bare samples, but the reflection from (uncoated) PMMA windows was slightly stronger than from the samples.
Samples of NiAl crystal cut along (100) planes were provided by K. McClellan (MST-8). These were irregularly-shaped targets, ~100 to 400 µm thick.
The flyer was attached to the substrate with five-minute epoxy, the flyer being pressed down to minimize the thickness of the glue layer. Spacer rings, punched from plastic shim stock, were inserted between the substrate and the target assembly (i.e. the window) to allow space for the flyer to accelerate. The distance from the free surface of the flyer to the impact surface of the sample is referred to as the barrel length. The complete assembly was screwed together in a target holder. Some shots in the series were dedicated to measuring the acceleration history of the flyer and hence the barrel length required to reach the maximum speed. We had anticipated that, between the uncertainty in laser energy delivered and the uncertainty in the barrel length, there might be a significant uncertainty in the impact time, particularly for the thicker flyers driven with lower energies. In the limited time available, we did not measure the thickness of the glue bond; this was potentially a cause for concern. In practice, the energy delivered was very close to the value requested, and the barrel length was also reproducible (indicating that the glue bond in the flyer was thin and reproducible), so the impact time could be predicted with reasonable accuracy.
All final assembly was performed in-house at TRIDENT.
We had planned to image the target into the line VISAR and then to the streak camera. In the event, Randy Johnson developed his previous technique of imaging the target straight through the VISAR (i.e. focused at infinity) to the camera to make better use of the full width of the camera. He also incorporated timing markers on the streak record. As before, the probe laser was made to produce a long (~1.5 µs) pulse to be able to capture the acceleration and impact of the flyer.
Since the P-24 point VISAR was not complete, we used the Sandia VISAR borrowed for the preceding experiments. The P-24 Verde laser was used.
We had intended to assemble the experiments so that the PMMA window was split, with half coplanar with the impact surface of the sample. This would provide a time fiducial for the arrival of the flyer. The PMMA semicircles did not arrive until after the start of the experimental session, so early experiments were performed with a full disc of PMMA. The VISAR recording window was usually not long enough to capture the impact of the flyer directly with the window, so this time fiducial -- and thus the direct measurement of shock speed - was not available in these experiments.
We investigated the use of an alternative technique, attaching the sample to a copper disc ~50 µm thick, as in flyer plate experiments at Z [2]. The shock breakout in the copper provided the time fiducial. This technique was not suitable for `symmetric impact' experiments where the flyer and sample were the same material.
We intended to perform all experiments so that the target was in contact with a PMMA window, providing a well-characterised loading history and facilitating sample recovery. Because of the relatively low reflectivity of the NiTi samples, and to make assembly simpler with a fiducial for shock arrival, some shots were fired with a bare sample. In these cases, the sample was lost.
Topic | Shots | Comments | |
Plan | Actual | ||
Diagnostic timing | 5 | 2 | |
Flyer acceleration | 12 | 9 | |
Impact timing | 2 | 0 | |
NiTi | 15 | 14 | Plan: per composition. |
NiAl | 12 | 8 | Plan: per orientation. |
Total | 46 | 33 | Plan: excludes some data shots. |
Shots per day | 8 | 11 |
Only two shots were required to time in the diagnostics, thanks to the work performed during Dennis Paisley's flyer development experiments immediately beforehand. Usable data were obtained from both VISARs in every other experiment, except for one NiTi shot in which the line VISAR record was obscured by window reflection. (There was considerable interference in other NiTi experiments, but the record was still usable.) Excellent flyer acceleration records were obtained for copper flyers of different thickness and using different energies. We decided to omit corresponding acceleration shots for NiTi flyers, and used an areal mass scaling instead. To save more time, we omitted copper/copper impacts to verify the barrel length, and proceeded directly with NiTi.
The target numbering for NiAl and NiTi samples is shown in Tables 4 to 6, and the complete list of shots in Table 7.
No. | Flyer | Barrel | Target | Windows |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cu, 105 | 300 | NiAl GE (001), 200 | PMMA disc |
2 | Cu, 105 | 300 | NiAl GE (001), 217 | PMMA disc |
3 | Cu, 105 | 200 | NiAl GE (001), 217 | PMMA disc |
4 | Cu, 250 | 150 | Cu, 55 um / NiAl GE (001), 398 | |
5 | Cu, 250 | 150 | Cu, 55 um / NiAl GE (001), 398 | |
6 | Cu, 250 | 150 | Cu, 55 um / NiAl GE (001), 398 | |
7 | Cu, 250 | 150 | NiAl GE (001), 398 | PMMA step-disc |
8 | Cu, 250 | 150 | NiAl GE (001), 398 | PMMA step-disc |
Code | Composition |
---|---|
5B | 52.5 at % Ni |
6B | 55.6 at % Ni |
No. | Flyer | Barrel | Target | Windows |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NiTi 5B, 90/80-85 edge | 300 | NiTi 5B, 191/181 edge | PMMA disc |
2 | NiTi 5B, 102/92-100 edge | 300 | NiTi 5B, 197/188 edge | PMMA disc |
3 | NiTi 5B, 108/101-106 edge | 200 | NiTi 5B, 202/192 edge | PMMA disc |
4 | NiTi 5B, 201/195 edge | 150 | NiTi 5B, 403/388 edge | PMMA step-disc |
5 | NiTi 5B, 207/204 edge | 150 | NiTi 5B, 404/399 edge | PMMA step-disc |
6 | NiTi 5B, 209/202 edge | 150 | NiTi 5B, 419/404 edge | PMMA step-disc |
7 | NiTi 5B, 154/148 edge | 375 | NiTi 5B, 300/290 edge | PMMA half-disc over flyer |
8 | NiTi 5B, 156/148 edge | 375 | NiTi 5B, 305/295 edge | PMMA half-disc over flyer |
9 | Cu, 55 | 200 | NiTi 5B, 88/85 edge | PMMA half-disc over flyer |
10 | Cu, 55 | 500 | NiTi 5B, 91/89 edge | PMMA half-disc over flyer |
11 | Cu, 55 | 500 | NiTi 5B, 95/85 edge | PMMA half-disc over flyer |
12 | Cu, 55 | 575 | NiTi 6B, 113/107 edge | PMMA half-disc over flyer |
13 | NiTi 6B, 90/86 edge | 200 | NiTi 6B, 211/208 edge | PMMA half-disc over flyer |
14 | NiTi 6B, 222/216 edge | 80 | NiTi 6B, 414/410 edge | PMMA half-disc over flyer |
Shot | Flyer | Barrel | Target | Energy | Line VISAR | Point VISAR | Comments | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(um) | (J) | sweep | delay | sweep | delay | ||||
(ns) | (ns) | (ns) | (ns) | ||||||
17 Dec | |||||||||
14117 | Cu, 105 µm | 1600 | PMMA | 10 | 2000 | 800 | 3000 | 3300 | point late, line ?early, recovery OK |
14118 | Cu, 105 µm | 1600 | PMMA | 9 | 2000 | 100 | 3000 | 2200 | Little motion. RPP shield discoloured => ?drive too low. |
14119 | Cu, 105 µm | 1600 | PMMA | 10 | 2000 | 100 | 3000 | 2200 | Beautiful acceleration to ~280 m/s. Noticed misty sheen to beam area of RPP. |
14120 | Cu, 105 µm | 1600 | PMMA | 5 | 2000 | 100 | 3000 | 2200 | Beautiful acceleration to ~160 m/s. Misty sheen no worse. |
14121 | Cu, 105 µm | 1600 | PMMA | 20 | 2000 | 100 | 3000 | 2200 | Beautiful acceleration to ~350 m/s. Flyer escaped through PMMA window. Misty sheen no worse. |
18 Dec | |||||||||
14123 | NiTi, 90 µm | 300 | NiTi, 191 µm / PMMA | 10 | 2000 | 100 | 3000 | 2200 | NiTi #1 |
14124 | NiTi, 102 µm | 300 | NiTi, 197 µm / PMMA | 20 | 2000 | 100 | 3000 | 2200 | NiTi #2 |
14125 | NiTi, 108 µm | 200 | NiTi, 202 µm / PMMA | 5 | 2000 | 100 | 3000 | 2200 | NiTi #3 |
14126 | Cu, 105 µm | 300 | NiAl 001, 200 µm / PMMA | 11 | 2000 | 100 | 3000 | 2200 | NiAl #1 |
14127 | Cu, 105 µm | 300 | NiAl 001, 217 µm / PMMA | 20 | 2000 | 100 | 3000 | 2200 | NiAl #2 |
14128 | Cu, 105 µm | 200 | NiAl 001, 217 µm / PMMA | 4 | 2000 | 100 | 3000 | 2200 | NiAl #3 |
14129 | Cu, 55 µm | 1600 | PMMA | 11 | 2000 | 100 | 3000 | 2200 | Accelerated to ~470 m/s |
14130 | Cu, 55 µm | 1600 | PMMA | 19 | 2000 | 100 | 3000 | 2200 | Accelerated to ~630 m/s |
14131 | Cu, 55 µm | 1600 | PMMA | 5 | 2000 | 100 | 3000 | 2200 | Accelerated to ~310 m/s |
14132 | Cu, 250 µm | 1600 | PMMA | 11 | 2000 | 100 | 3000 | 2200 | Accelerated to ~130 m/s |
19 Dec | |||||||||
14134 | Cu, 250 µm | 1600 | PMMA | 24 | 2000 | 100 | 3000 | 2200 | Accelerated to ~220 m/s |
14135 | Cu, 250 µm | 1600 | PMMA | 5 | 2000 | 100 | 3000 | 2200 | Accelerated to ~80 m/s |
14136 | Cu, 250 µm | 150 | Cu, 55 µm / NiAl 001, 398 µm | 11 | 2000 | 1600 | 3000 | 3700 | NiAl #4 (Cu baseplate) |
14137 | Cu, 250 µm | 150 | Cu, 55 µm / NiAl 001, 398 µm | 19 | 2000 | 1600 | 3000 | 3700 | NiAl #5 (Cu baseplate) |
14138 | Cu, 250 µm | 150 | Cu, 55 µm / NiAl 001, 398 µm | 15 | 2000 | 1600 | 3000 | 3700 | NiAl #6 (Cu baseplate) |
14139 | Cu, 250 µm | 150 | NiAl 001, 398 µm / PMMA | 11 | 2000 | 1100 | 3000 | 2200 | NiAl #7 (PMMA step-disc) |
14140 | Cu, 250 µm | 150 | NiAl 001, 398 µm / PMMA | 20 | 2000 | 1100 | 3000 | 2700 | NiAl #8 (PMMA step-disc) |
14141 | NiTi, 201 µm | 150 | NiTi, 403 µm / PMMA | 11 | 2000 | 1100 | 3000 | 2700 | NiTi #4 (PMMA step-disc) |
14142 | NiTi, 207 µm | 150 | NiTi, 404 µm / PMMA | 19 | 2000 | 700 | 3000 | 2700 | NiTi #5 (PMMA step-disc) |
14143 | NiTi, 209 µm | 150 | NiTi, 409 µm / PMMA | 16 | 2000 | 1100 | 3000 | 2700 | NiTi #6 (PMMA step-disc) |
14144 | NiTi, 154 µm | 375 | NiTi, 300 µm | 10 | 2000 | 1600 | 3000 | 2700 | NiTi #7 (PMMA impact fiducial) |
20 Dec | |||||||||
14146 | NiTi, 156 µm | 375 | NiTi, 305 µm | 22 | 2000 | 1600 | 3000 | 2700 | NiTi #8 (PMMA impact fiducial) |
14147 | Cu, 55 µm | 200 | NiTi, 88 µm | 12 | 2000 | 600 | 3000 | 2700 | NiTi #9 (PMMA impact fiducial) |
14148 | Cu, 55 µm | 500 | NiTi, 91 µm | 21 | 2000 | 1100 | 3000 | 2700 | NiTi #10 (PMMA impact fiducial) Fringes not clear. |
14149 | Cu, 55 µm | 500 | NiTi, 95 µm | 17 | 2000 | 600 | 3000 | 2700 | NiTi #11 (PMMA impact fiducial) |
14150 | Cu, 55 µm | 580 | NiTi, 113 µm | 20 | 2000 | 600 | 3000 | 2700 | NiTi (new comp) #12 (PMMA impact fiducial) |
14151 | NiTi, 90 µm | 200 | NiTi, 211 µm | 10 | 2000 | 600 | 3000 | 2700 | NiTi #13 (PMMA impact fiducial) |
14152 | NiTi, 222 µm | 100 | NiTi, 414 µm | 11 | 2000 | 600 | 3000 | 2700 | NiTi #14 (PMMA impact fiducial) |
We collected NiTi data including histories for interface speed and free surface speed as a function of impactor speed. The data included some measurements of shock speed, but the uncertainty in this quantity may be quite large,
The NiAl data were similar, though fewer shots were fired; the sample finish was smoother, so the fringe contrast in the line VISAR was very high.
It should be possible to extract EOS and strength data on NiTi and NiAl from these experiments. The recovered samples are also available for metallographic analysis, if desired.
Detailed analysis of the VISAR data is in progress.
We would like to have further TRIDENT time to complete the planned measurements on both materials, as well as to perform follow-up work.
This work was performed in part under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract # W-7405-ENG-36.
Allan Hauer | ICF&RP Program Manager | hauer@lanl.gov
|
Steve Batha | ICF&RP Experiments Manager | sbatha@lanl.gov
|
Dan Thoma | LDRD-ER PI | thoma@lanl.gov
|
Aaron Koskelo | LDRD-DR PI | koskelo@lanl.gov
|
Cris Barnes | P-24 Group Office | cbarnes@lanl.gov
|
Carter Munson | P-24 Group Office | cmunson@lanl.gov
|
Robert Gibson | TRIDENT team leader | rbg@lanl.gov
|
Randy Johnson | TRIDENT | rpjohnson@lanl.gov
|
George Kyrala | P-24 Target Physics Team Leader | kyrala@lanl.gov
|
Dennis Paisley | P-24 Materials Team | paisley@lanl.gov
|
Robert Hackenberg | MST-6 | roberth@lanl.gov
|
Ken McClellan | MST-8 | kmcclellan@lanl.gov
|